A Structured Method for Planning, Building and Reviewing Learning Projects
A Structured Method for Planning, Building and Reviewing Learning Projects.
Discuss Delivery RequirementsDelivery Phases
Our typical delivery methodology encompasses the following phases. Specific project phases are confirmed during the definition stage and documented in an agreed Statement of Work.
DISCOVERY
Understand goals, audiences, content, technology and constraints.
DEFINITION
Confirm scope, deliverables, responsibilities, dependencies and acceptance expectations.
DESIGN
Develop curriculum, learning structure, learner journeys, activities and technical plans.
DEVELOPMENT
Build approved learning content, assets, platform configuration or supporting materials.
REVIEW
Conduct internal, subject-matter and stakeholder reviews.
QUALITY ASSURANCE
Review content, learning alignment, functionality, responsive behavior, accessibility considerations and platform delivery.
ACCEPTANCE AND LAUNCH
Resolve agreed findings, confirm handover requirements and prepare release.
SUPPORT AND IMPROVEMENT
Maintain content or platforms under an agreed follow-on scope.
Note: We do not present this as a fixed timeline; actual timelines vary by project scale and complexity.
Responsibility Model
Clear responsibilities ensure smooth project progression. Final responsibilities depend on the contract and scope, but typically follow this framework.
CLIENT MAY OWN
- business goals
- final content accuracy
- subject-matter approval
- legal and regulatory decisions
- platform contracts
- user and data policy
- timely access
- stakeholder decisions
- final acceptance
THEEDUASSIST MAY SUPPORT
- learning strategy
- instructional design
- development
- platform configuration
- content organization
- quality assurance
- documentation
- handover
SHARED RESPONSIBILITIES
- planning
- scope clarification
- reviews
- risk identification
- prioritization
- acceptance criteria
- launch decisions
- maintenance planning
Change Control
To manage risk and maintain delivery quality, requests outside the agreed scope are evaluated systematically:
- requested change
- scope evaluation
- effort and dependency review
- impact on schedule or cost
- approval
- implementation
- testing
- documentation
Quality and Acceptance
Acceptance reviews ensure deliverables meet agreed objectives. We do not claim a universal fixed acceptance checklist; instead, criteria are defined per project.
Possible Review Categories
- content accuracy
- instructional alignment
- functionality
- responsive behavior
- assessment logic
- accessibility observations
- platform behavior
- links and downloads
- media
- stakeholder requirements